الاستئناف والأثر غير الإيقافي ووقف التنفيذ في القانون الإماراتي: دراسة مقارنة : Appeal, Non-Suspensive Effect, and Stay of Execution in United Arab Emirates (UAE) Law: A Comparative Study

Ismaeil Ibrahim Husain Ali Alhosani; Dina Imam Supaat; Mahmoud Mohamed Ali Mahmoud Edris

doi:10.55265/lpssjournal.v4i1.73

Authors

Ismaeil Ibrahim Husain Ali Alhosani Faculty of Syariah and Law, Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia, 71800, Nilai, Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia
Dina Imam Supaat Faculty of Syariah and Law, Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia, 71800 Nilai, Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia
Mahmoud Mohamed Ali Mahmoud Edris Faculty of Syariah and Law, Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia, 71800 Nilai, Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55265/lpssjournal.v4i1.73

Keywords:

Appeal, judicial, non-suspensive effect, legal system, al-istī’nāf, al-qaḍā’ī, al-athar ghayr al-wāqif, al-niẓām al-qānūnī

Abstract

The objective of the study was to identify Appeal, Non-Suspensive Effect, and Stay of Execution in UAE Law: A Comparative Study. The study reached many important findings, including that no legal texts define the suspension of execution of an administrative decision, whether in the Egyptian, French or Emirati State Council law. Therefore, its determination was left to the jurisprudence and the judiciary. The Egyptian and Emirati legislators granted the judge the discretionary authority to suspend the implementation of the administrative decision, without obligating him to take the decision to suspend it. The UAE administrative judiciary added a seriousness requirement to accept requests to suspend the implementation of the administrative decision, although the legislator did not impose this obligation, which constitutes an obstacle to the settlement of these requests. The French legislator innovated the inclusion of the suspension of execution system within the competencies of the judge of urgent administrative matters, under the new codification that entered into force on the 1st of January 2001, where a distinction was made between the annulment lawsuit and the application for suspension of execution, making the annulment judge different from the execution judge, an advanced legislative development that reflects the French legislator's realization of the importance of expediting the decision on applications for suspension of execution in order to achieve immediate justice.

ملخص البحث

هدفت الدراسة إلى التعرف على الطعن القضائي: الاستئناف والأثر غير الإيقافي ووقف التنفيذ في القانون الإماراتي: دراسة مقارنة، وقد اعتمد الباحث في دراسته على المنهج الوصفي التحليلي والمنهج المقارن، وتوصلت الدراسة إلى العديد من النتائج من أهمها: أنه لا توجد نصوص قانونية تحدد تعريفًا لوقف تنفيذ القرار الإداري، سواء في قانون مجلس الدولة المصري أو الفرنسي أو الإماراتي، إذ تُرك تحديده للفقه والقضاء، وقد منح المشرع المصري والإماراتي للقاضي السلطة التقديرية في مسألة وقف تنفيذ القرار الإداري، دون إلزامه باتخاذ قرار الوقف، حيث أضاف القضاء الإداري الإماراتي شرط الجدية لقبول طلبات وقف تنفيذ القرار الإداري، على الرغم من أن المشرع لم يفرض هذا الشرط، مما يشكل عقبة في سبيل حسم هذه الطلبات، وابتكر المشرع الفرنسي إدراج نظام وقف التنفيذ ضمن اختصاصات قاضي الأمور الإدارية المستعجلة، بموجب التقنين الجديد الذي دخل حيز التنفيذ في الأول من يناير 2001، حيث تم التفريق بين دعوى الإلغاء وطلب وقف التنفيذ، مما جعل قاضي الإلغاء مختلفًا عن قاضي التنفيذ، وهو تطور تشريعي متقدم يعكس إدراك المشرع الفرنسي لأهمية تسريع البت في طلبات وقف التنفيذ من أجل تحقيق العدالة الفورية.

References

Abdallah, A. G. B. (1990). Suspension of administrative decisions in administrative judiciary rulings. Alexandria: Manshat Al-Maaref.

Abdel Basset, M. F. (1997). Suspension of administrative decision. Alexandria: University Thought House.

Abdel Wahab, M. R. (2006). Administrative judiciary. Beirut: Al-Halabi Legal Publications.

Abdullah El-Sheikh, E. (2008). The effectiveness of the suspension system of administrative decisions in achieving balance between administration and individuals. Cairo: Dar Al-Nahda Al-Arabia.

Ali, A. Y. M. (2023). Suspension of administrative decisions in Egyptian and French law [Unpublished master's thesis]. Higher Institute for Computers, Information and Management Technology, Tanta, Al-Azhar University.

Al-Mekkawi, A. A. (2012). The administrative decision. Cairo: Tayba Publishing and Distribution.

Al-Qubailat, H. (2010). Administrative law. Amman: Wael Publishing House.

Al-Senousi, S. M. (2015). Procedures before the administrative judiciary. Cairo: Dar Al-Nahda Al-Arabia.

Article (4) of the Grievances Board Procedures Law issued by Royal Decree No. (M/3) dated 22/1/1435 AH.

Article (8/5) of the Procedures Law issued by Royal Decree No. (M/3) dated 22/1/1435 AH.

Asfour, S. (2010). Administrative judiciary. Alexandria: Manshat Al-Maaref.

Batikh, R. (2000). Administrative judiciary (2nd ed.). Cairo: Dar Al-Nahda Al-Arabia.

Decision of the Board of Grievances in Primary Case No. 1/10998Q for the year 1437 AH, published in the Collection of Primary Rulings for the Year 1437 AH.

Decision. (n.d.). Alexandria: Modern Printing House.

Encyclopedia of administrative judiciary. (2007). (K. Shetnaoui, Ed.). Amman: Dar Al-Thaqafa Library for Publishing and Distribution.

Fahd, F. S. A. (2023). Suspension lawsuit of administrative decisions: A doctrinal and applied study. Journal of the Faculty of Islamic and Arabic Studies for Girls, (8).

Gamal El-Din, S. (2005). Administrative dispute procedures in the annulment of administrative decisions. Alexandria: Manshat Al-Maaref.

Harjah, M. M. (2010). The new in urgent judiciary. Cairo: Dar Al-Thaqafa for Printing and Publishing.

Khalifa, A. A. A. M. (2006). Urgent administrative matters judiciary. Alexandria: University Thought House.

Mohamed Badr, A. A. (2013). Suspension of administrative decisions (PhD thesis). Faculty of Law, Cairo University.

Nasser Abdel Halim, S. (2009). The enforcement of administrative decisions in Jordanian judiciary: A comparative study (PhD thesis). Faculty of Law, Ain Shams University.

Othman, H. O. M. (2016). Principles of administrative law. Alexandria: New University House.

Radi, M. L. (2008). Administrative judiciary. Iraq: Hawar Printing Press Publications.

Rateb, M. A. M. (1985). Urgent matters judiciary. Cairo: Alam Al-Kitab.

Ruling of the Administrative Court in Case No. 99 of Judicial Year 25 – Session dated 22/12/1970.

Ruling of the Supreme Administrative Court in Appeal No. 680 of Judicial Year 44 – Session dated 26-6-2002. Collection of the State Lawsuits Authority for Supreme Administrative Court Rulings, 2001–2002.

Salama, S. A. H. (2011). Negative administrative decision. Alexandria: New University House.